America, The Worst Economic Investment Ever? A Sinking Titanic. They Said She Would Always Float!

11-17-2017

Unit 6 Discussion 1 Response 2 Gary

Response from: Miss. Bayo Elizabeth Cary, AA, BA, MLIS

One of my responsibilities that I was responsible for in the field of security was detecting employee breaches of policy and ensuring that they were appropriately dealt with according to policy. Needless to say, I was not very popular among my fellow colleagues. One of my processes involved stripping the images out of all the e-mails that were sent throughout the organization and ensuring that there was no content that broke our current policy. There were some very inappropriate and disturbing images that I saw while working in that position that required Human Resource involvement. This information was treated as confidential and it was clearly understood that I was not permitted to discuss any of this information with people without a valid need-to-know (i.e. the employee, their manager, and Human Resources) (“Need to Know Principle,” n.d.).

The reasons for me keeping this information confidential were mostly ethical in nature. First, others could think less of a particular employee if they knew the types of content they were sending to other people inside and outside of the organization. This could hurt this employee’s reputation and have an impact on their success within the organization. Additionally, the employee could feel embarrassed or humiliated if they found out that other employees knew what they had done. Eventually, the employee may choose to leave the organization in order to search for a fresh start. In worst case scenarios, this information could make its way to other individuals outside of the organization and result in hurting the employee’s career or even destroying their personal life. In some cases, the employee might attempt to sue for hurting their career, the pain of a destroyed personal life, or the humiliation and suffering that resulted from your actions.

Second, in some cases, my investigations could result in the employee being terminated. Talking about these investigations might result in others knowing that the employee was going to be terminated before the employee knew.  Imagine how terrible the employee would feel if they overheard other people talking about how they were going to be let go. In the worst case scenario, since the employee knew they were going to be let go anyway, they may steal company information, sabotage the organization, or even become physically violent.

Third, talking about this information could undermine the trust that other people place in me. Outside of dealing with employee policy infractions, I also dealt with company confidential information on a regular basis. If I could not keep employee policy violations a secret, then I would not be trustworthy to deal with other data that could cost the company millions of dollars if it were disclosed to the public. Security personnel must be trustworthy and have a proven record of integrity. A person can spend their whole lives proving that they are trustworthy, but it only takes a momentary lapse of reason to destroy that trust. Once this trust has been destroyed, it is almost impossible to ever gain again.

When working in security, it is always best to err on the side of caution. Communicate important information with only those who need it, but never disclose that information outside of the realm of those with a valid need-to-know. Remember, that once it is gone, you may never be able to regain someone’s trust again, and you may find your career come to a complete standstill.

Need to Know Principle. (n.d.). Retrieved November 11, 2017, from http://researchcompliance.unm.edu/is-needtoknow 

Response from: Miss. Bayo Elizabeth Cary, AA, BA, MLIS

How great of a threat do would-be American jihadis pose to their home country?

And do Americans who return home after gaining experience fighting abroad in Islamist insurgencies or attending terror training camps pose a greater risk than

other jihadi militants? (Wright, 2016, p. 32)

Introduction: American Economics:

A Sinking Titanic-The Worst Investment? They Said She Would Always Float:

         Security, is not possible, in the US-you can try though. America, is a country, of immigrant, and refugee terror. The cultures, that are expressed, and the illegal activities, that are permitted, are learned in other countries, and then-forced upon Americans. Personal behaviors, reflect on your professional life. Many corporate offices, do have IT access, and online social networking, guidelines, to protect the image, of the company. It is a choice, that an individual must make, how to interact, and how to support other employees, at a work environment:

Case Study: The UK and Spain:

Kenny’s case study of jihadi plots in the UK and Spain concludes that cell members developed important skills by attending terrorist training camps abroad. When combined with the specific geographic, cultural, and social knowledge only a local would have, plots involving those with longtime ties to the areas in the West where the plot was launched were found to be more effective. (Wright, 2016, p. 32)

There are Federal, State, and local regulations, that guide activities, while working. There are also, corporation rules-that support, the US laws. American laws, do not affect Intl terror-who refuse to acculturate. Intl terror, train to attack America-they come here, learn the details, then fly to a severe austere brutal training environment-like: “Hebrew School in Israel,” and then-they are-allowed-to return to America, to kill us: “Genocide.”

America Illegally Supports Uninhibited Immigration:

             

       Intl terror, who continue to immigrate to the US, and then-send their offspring, and adopted children home, to train as jihadists, argue, that terror in the US, is a: “Lone Wolf,” event (Wright, 2016, p. 37). Intl terror state, that-it is almost impossible, to shut-down an Intl terrorists cell now-post: 9/11, because it is obvious, that only 1 person, is ever responsible (Wright, 2016, p. 37. Intl terror are adamant, that, Intl terror cells-no longer exist, and apparently, the US government is agreeing with the lies (Wright, 2016, p. 37). Intl terror, are through-out the US, and attempt to integrate themselves, into American communities-where they are most unwelcome. The terror, threaten American lives, and then, our US law enforcement-refuse to respond: “Genocide.”

        When people, break a serious law or rule, in a US business, and working environment, such as: sexual harassment, there are supposed to be, safe ways, to report the offense. The US has in place: “Whistle blower,” protection laws, which-are supposed to keep employees, from being stigmatized, when the file a complaint, or a legal claim. “Whistle blower protections,” in-reality, do not keep Americans safe. Snowden, reported illegal, Intl terrorist activities, at the US NSA headquarters, in Virginia, and had to leave the US, or die.

Neoliberalism, Intl Terror and Democrats, and American Political Movement:

         “Neoliberalism,” the new American Democratic party and policies, support Intl terror:

As Stuart Hall, Doreen Massey and Michael Rustin (2013, 5) explain, neoliberalism demands “low tax regimes, limited state interference, and unimpeded access to markets and vital resources”. As a political philosophy, neoliberalism emphasizes profit-making as the essence of democracy and consumption as the most operable form of citizenship (Di Leo et al. 2012). (Baker-Beall, et., al., 2015, p. 2)

The focus in the United States, is spending money, and not earning money. People have no cares-whatsoever, in regards, to where the money came from. The American government, as part of their support, for Intl terror, invests, in a huge Intl Black market, drugs slaves and pushing, and trafficking of human slaves. American law enforcement, are paid to ignore crime, because the: “Neoliberal LBGT political movement,” believes, that responding to social ills, impedes, the free-trading, and illegal financial markets (Baker-Beall, et, al., 2015, p. 2).

America, and no Social Services:

                  America, is a dangerous country-there are: laws, statutes, rules, and regulations. There is the US Constitution, and there are lawyers. The court systems, and the lawyers-at present, do not support US law. If you have a valid legal complaint, that your: civil, or human rights, have been violated, US law enforcement, at a: Federal, State, or local level-do not respond either:

According to Susan George (1999), it has led to growing inequality, with neoliberalism having precipitated a massive transfer of wealth, power and resources from the poorest in society to the richest.2 As Hall, Massey, and Rustin (2013, 4) explain, “it has encouraged private capital to hollow-out the welfare state and dismantle… structures of health, welfare and education services” in the pursuit of profit. (Baker-Beall, 2015, p. 2-3)

The West, The Absence of Human Rights: America:

There are no civil, or human rights, in the US. People here, are only concerned about money-most of the time. The human factor, has been left out. Americans do not care, if you are: sick, or dying, or homeless, or hungry, or if you need medical care, or medicine, or if you even need payphone, to make a payphone. You must fight, every-day. People attack you-everywhere you go, and then kick you on the ground, and spit on you, as you lay bleeding, and dying in a gutter. There are: laws, statutes, rules, and regulations, on the books-and, there is no way, to reinforce any of them. “Antidisestablishmentarianism.” America, is a country of: anarchy. Nothing in America, can be kept confidential.

References

Baker-Beall, Christopher, Heath-Kelly, Charlotte, and Jarvis, Lee. (2015). Neoliberalism and/as Terror. Critical Studies on Terrorism. Vol. 8, No. 1. p. 1-14. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2015.1009761

Wright, Christopher. (2016). Perspectives on Terrorism. How Dangerous Are Domestic Terror Plotters with Foreign Fighter Experience? The Case of Homegrown Jihadis in the US. Perspectives on Terrorism. Vol. 10, Issue. 1. ISSN: 2334-3745