BYOD Work Environment-Irresponsible-No Information Safety-EVER!
11-28-2017
Unit 7 Discussion 1 Post 2 Response
Response from: Miss. Bayo Elizabeth Cary, AA, BA, MLIS
They
wanted the Samsung Galaxy Note and the Kindle
Fire
and, most desperately of all, the iPhone: the pinnacle of gadget culture,
the
device that gave rise to a new
acronym
in corporate America--BYOD--and forced IT managers everywhere to allow Apple
products into the workplace. (Honan, 2013, p. 2)
The
primary purpose, of the new design, of the iPhone, by Apple computer systems,
was to create a cellphone, and computer environment, to collect information
illegally, that should not be shared, with others-covert information (Honan,
2013, p. 1-7). I think it would be legally irresponsible, for any hospital
system, to support, a BYOD, electronics environment. You may believe, that you
know about an iPhone, and what information disappears. I think it is pure
ignorance, to believe, that iPhone information disappears, after a certain
number, of failed attempts, at entering a pass code.
In, 2012, Microsoft saw themselves, as: “non-competitive,” because the
goal, for Microsoft, was to illegally design a monopoly, on world markets, and
after Apple invented the iPhone, and the new pass code-that protects illegal
information, Microsoft, began to believe, that they were no longer-the dominant
controller, of Intl computer markets and sales (Honan, 2013, p. 1-7). Electronic
information, is contained, on bits, and pieces, of actual electronics, and not
just on software programming. I could confidently argue, that most-if not all
iPhone information-remains accessible, in various ways, even if the pass code,
is a failed entry-and not just retained, in: “the cloud.”
In
2012, to regain complete control-over and above Apple, of Intl computer markets
and sales, Microsoft attempted to create, a computer sales market, to add
Windows 8 to, to force Apple, out-of-the-market (Honan, 2013, p. 1-7). When
someone does the wrong thing, and the person does not care-then, the criminal,
is not concerned at all, if the evidence disappears, or not. Intl terror-who
commit crimes, of identity theft, and who steal PII information, to illegally sell
it-do not care. Intl terror, do not care, if they are caught. Intl terror, are
retarded, and think, that what they do, is wrong, and they do it with
impunity-regardless: “sociopathic.”
Microsoft, was not able, to create a computer
with appeal, and after a series of product introduction parties in the US,
designed for alcoholics-who were willing to le, about the quality, of any product
anywhere, the Windows 8 application, and the accompanying Microsoft
computer-received bad reviews (Honan, 2013, p. 1). When someone, could care
less, about being caught, and about committing the crime, in the first
place-like: Intl terror, then, the evidence-is part of the crime. “Hitler,” a
figure of appeal, and demigod, for Intl terror, also documented, his: “crimes
against humanity,” as part of his glorification, and demonstration, of insane
power.
I do
not support, a BYOD environment-not, for any business environment, anywhere.
Intl terror, are painfully dishonest. Intl terror, pretend to be honest,
hard-working, and caring individuals. Then, if someone supporting Intl terror,
is offered a small sum of money, to do the wrong activity-they take the money,
and attack anyone. Microsoft, had the wrong intentions, in 2012-when, they
worked too hard, to compete, with the Apple iPhone, to manage and contain,
covert information-that could have been easier copied, and moved out, of a US
business, and working environment (Honan, 2013, p. 1).
I think Intl terror, are
opportunistic criminals, who try sometimes, to hide deviance, to manipulate
themselves, into a more powerful employment position, to cause more damage, to:
normal, healthy, hard-working Americans. It is true, that you have-to-take your
chances. It is also true, that decisions, need to be responsible. A BYOD, work
environment, is not a responsible decision. It is clear, from the impetus, that
motivates computer and software companies, in the US-like: Apple, and Microsoft,
that the company ethos, is a corporate environment, in support of Intl terror, and
not purely, for financial reasons.
References
Honan, Mat. (2013). Microsoft. Wired.
Vol. 21, Iss. 5. p. 1-7. Retrieved from http://library.capella.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/14118518
38?accountid=27965
Comments
Post a Comment